Hyperledger Blockchain: Why the MVE is more important than the MVP.

Minimum Viable Ecosystem tops Minimum Viable Product in Hyperledger Blockchain for Business.

As Hyperledger Blockchain continues to gain traction in enterprise organizations, patterns and best practices are starting to emerge. One of the clear new perspectives is the importance of the network, or ecosystem. Blockchain for Business enables trust across participating entities instead of just the miners and owners of a crypto currency, and defining, creating, operating, and enabling those networks is key to achieving the maximum benefits of a business blockchain.

Supply chain management presents a clear example, as most products are touched by many hands among the raw materials suppliers, the transporters, the manufactures, the wholesalers and retailers, and end consumers and regulators. The elimination of duplicate data input, data transport, data reconciliation, and data synchronization delivers good benefits when even just 2 entities of the supply chain share a blockchain distributed ledger. But the results become great and even more dramatic when all entities are using the same blockchain.

Data / asset provenance is a valuable benefit of Blockchain generally, and even more so in supply chain management. However any missing members could negate many of those benefits, especially for recalls or other defect tracking. The more important provenance is for a business network use case, the more important it is to identify the crucial members. It may not be as important to track an automobile purchaser back to the dealer as to track a defective air bag component back to the manufacturer. However a food supply chain may need the grocery store and the distributor and the transporter and the farmer to effectively track the source of an e. coli outbreak.

So while identifying the application functionality is of course required, designing and building the MVE is necessary to accurately define the MVP. And building the full ecosystem is strongly desired to receive the maximum benefits. A fantastically built application is useless without adoption across a network and organizations should identify and build the MVE before finalizing the MVP.

Hyperledger Blockchain for Business is really about the network even more than the application functionality. Belltane works with organizations in the critical task of identifying, defining, and implementing blockchain business networks as well as providing the applications and services for those networks to create total Hyperledger Blockchain solutions.

Thanks to IBM for sharing their learning and experiences with the Hyperledger community and their contributions to Hyperledger Fabric and Composer.

hyperledger

Confusing Bitcoin with Blockchain

Bitcoin is but one of many Blockchain Implementations

I just finished reading the European Parliament report How blockchain technology could change our lives. All in all it is a most excellent summary and highly recommended. Nevertheless there are several points I wish to dispute, and they all confuse Bitcoin with Blockchain.

Blockchain as a concept primarily requires immutability of records and consensus across the distributed shared ledgers. Bitcoin is a specific implementation of Blockchain that addresses these in a manner judged most suited to the currency use case. Other use cases may not be well served and might even be hindered by the same approach.

Notably, Bitcoin utilizes PoW (Proof of Work) as the consensus mechanism to insure all participants in the ledger agree on the value of a record. PoW imposes a cost to participants and encourages wide-spread participation by providing a reward for running a node on the Bitcoin network. This is generally referred to as ‘Mining’, and the assumption that mining and extra cost are inherent in Blockchain underlies much of the report.

Blockchain does not require a specific form of consensus and therefor allows agreement mechanisms to potentially be better matched to each use case. If Company A and Company B set up a Blockchain network to trade just with each other, what would be the point in forcing an extra computational cost on their selves? As noted in the report, ‘In 2014 the Bitcoin blockchain was responsible for electricity consumption comparable to that of Ireland, and has only grown since.’ The inherit benefits of using a shared ledger provide more than sufficient incentive for participants to run their own nodes on the network without any additional reward.

Bitcoin is the simplest use case of Blockchain technology. It tracks one asset, a currency. It has one attribute, an owner. And it has one action or method, change owner. That’s not to disparage the Bitcoin implementation of Blockchain. That’s just all a currency needs. Blockchain defines this abstractly as any asset, with any attributes and any actions.

The report also generally assumes the Blockchain network is open and anyone can participate, or the network is closed and centrally managed. It is Bitcoin that requires the first and “‘mainstream’ actors such as banks and governments” attempting the latter. There are arguments for both use cases, but Blockchain does not require an either / or proposition as stated. Any network may utilize a Blockchain among its participants that is closed and permissioned, yet still not centrally managed and controlled except by consensus of all of the participants.

We at Belltane think it dangerous to mistake many of the assumptions of the specific implementation by Bitcoin as required or appropriate for many Blockchain use cases. We are convinced the Hyperledger Project delivers the appropriate abstractions that allow specific Blockchain implementations to utilize the most beneficial aspects of different approaches for its use case without requiring any one in particular.

The Hyperledger Project even includes an implementation mechanism where the consensus mechanism is hardware based (Sawtooth) and the recent addition of the Indy Identity Management project under the Hyperledger umbrella offers a solution to many of the identity concerns cited in the report.

I strongly encourage anyone interested in the best Blockchain overview I have read to date to check out the excellent EU Blockchain report, while noting Belltane and Hyperledger believe some portions to confuse Bitcoin the specific implementation with Blockchain in the abstract.

hyperledger

First Atlanta Hyperledger Meetup Scheduled for May 1.

The first Atlanta Hyperledger (Blockchain) Meetup is set for May 1, 6 – 8 pm, at Tech Square Labs. Looking forward to meeting everyone.

We’ll start with extensive introductions and get a feel of the group’s exposure to Hyperledger. Then we’ll review the current state of Hyperledger, the various projects and components that are part of the Hyperledger project, and explore the architecture of Hyperledger Fabric.

Speakers are invited to request a spot on the agenda.

Members are invited to request other topics for the meeting.

See everyone there.

Modern Best Practices for Financials: Period Close

Period Close to Financial Reports

Streamlining the Close Process for a more nimble organization is often a challenging strategic goal for many financial executives. This article focuses on the Financial Best Practice Period Close to Financial Reports, identifying the core components, discussing the importance and implications of each, and high-lighting the solutions delivered by the Oracle Financials Cloud.

The Oracle Financials Cloud implements and enforces modern best practices for Financials. The key process flows provide a clear and simple path to create and maintain a successful results-focused state of the art financial organization. Continue reading